Randomly browsing the net
one day, undoubtedly because I had little to do, I came across an article from Matt
Walsh, speaking on the Daily Wire Youtube site, which, I think, best
summarizes the pro-abortion pro-choice argument. Walsh claims that most
pro-abortion arguments are smoke screens for the real arguments, and I believe
he’s correct. Sophie Lewis, feminist and author of Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family (a quite revealing title)
is his subject to prove that point. In an interview Walsh features, Lewis honestly
says abortion is a form of killing that we need to defend. That, I think, is
the substance of every pro-choice pro-abortion argument. As I watched this
video, I thought that, in fact, those who are pro-choice can’t say they want to
defend killing so they must mask what they want in the form of arguments about
the “personhood” of the fetus, for instance. In essence, they must mask their
desire to kill something with metaphysical argument while biology clearly shows
the fetus is a living human being. What they really want is moral permission to
kill a living being they do not want to keep or support.
I found it interesting
that she has to say abortion is a “form” of killing. We never say killing a house
fly or a tumor is a “form” of killing. We use words like this to mask
underlying uncomfortable feelings. Even in this interview it seems her moral sense
is bothering her, but she wants to coax her moral sense over to the other side
hoping to feed it enough lies to keep it quiet. I feel she’s trying to talk
herself into a moral stance she can’t yet defend.
The pic is from Walsh’s video and here is the link to
the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J2xLCxZ4JE
In addition, she does appear elsewhere on the net. Here’s
a more detailed interview with her on abortion where she echoes the thoughts that
Walsh talks about. Here she calls being pregnant “gestational work” – another euphemism
to undoubtedly calm her moral sense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMGptJXz618
I should mention that I did an article on the claim
that the liberal left is immoral when it comes to life and death and the post
is at https://thesecularleftcritique.wordpress.com/when-it-comes-to-life-and-death-the-liberal-left-is-immoral/.
"What liberalism does, in this case, is teach people to
be irresponsible. It also damages the family structure because neither the
mother or father considers the needs of the child. The funny thing about
liberalism is that on the one hand Hillary Clinton can opine that it takes
a village to raise a child while on the other hand her secular philosophy
denies that parents should even care about their children and can kill them if
their autonomy is threatened. Apparently, it takes a village assuming the
village cares."
No comments:
Post a Comment